Bishi v secretary for education

Author: kntg

August undefined, 2024

WebJan 30, 2014 · See Kombayi v Berkhou SC 30/1988 and Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (H) at page 243 B. I am satisfied upon perusal of the record that the period of delay is not inordinate, the explanation tendered for the delay is reasonable. In my view Appellant also has good prospects of success on appeal. WebFor the factors that the court will take into account in deciding whether to allow a late application for review, see Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (H). Within …

ZimLII

WebBishi. v . Secretary for Education (supra). In my judgment, I find that the following factors compensate for the delay in filing this application and the poor explanation therefor: the slight delay in filing the opposing papers. the explanation for that slight delay. WebThe standard factors to be considered in deciding whether or not to condone the late filing of an application for review are: the degree of non-compliance, the explanation for it; and the applicants prospects of success- Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (H); Mushaishi v Lifeline Syndicate and Another 1990 (1) ZLR 284 (H); Vrystaat … how to shoot in hoops roblox

Judicial Review Zimbabwe Legal Information Institute

WebThese are the reasons for the order. On 17 January 2013 the respondent instituted proceedings by way of summons against the two applicants claiming payment of a sum … WebJul 29, 2005 · The standard factors to be considered in deciding whether or not to condone the late filing of an application for review are: the degree of non-compliance, the explanation for it; and the applicants prospects of success- Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (H); Mushaishi v Lifeline Syndicate and Another 1990 (1) ZLR 284 (H ); … Webthe case of Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 and Ndebele v Ncube 1992 (1) ZLR 288 (S). The court is not able to find fault on defendant. There is nothing placed before the court to show he was timeously requested to provide a synopsis of evidence, let nottingham blvd west palm beach

Tshuma v Dhlamini and Others ( HB 5/07 ) [2007] ZWBHC 5 (10

WebApr 16, 2024 · In the case of Bishi v Secretary for Education, the court commented on the importance of mitigation as follows, “Even justice administered under a palm tree … WebMar 14, 2016 · See also Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (HC); United Plant Hire (Pvt) Ltd v Hills & Ors 1976 (1) SA 717 (A); Chimunda v Zimuto & Anor SC 361/05; Viking Woodwork (Pvt) Ltd vs Blue Bells Enterprises (Pvt) Ltd 1998 (2) ZLR 249 (SC) These requirements have been summarised as; the degree of non-compliance; ... how to shoot in hoopverse pcWebIn Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (HC) it was held per CHIDYAUSIKU J (as he then was) that the following are the factors to be taken into account in considering whether good cause has been shown: “(a) the degree of non-compliance with the rules; (b) the explanation therefore; nottingham boiler solutions

"WebBishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (H) Blacker v University of Cape Town & Anor 1993 (4) SA 402 (C) Blue Ribbon Foods Ltd v Dube NO & Anor1993 (2) ZLR 146 … " - Bishi v secretary for education

Bishi v secretary for education

Judicial Review Zimbabwe Legal Information Institute

WebMar 2, 2003 · If authority is required for this self evident concept, it is to be found in Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (H) at 242D; and Mushaishi v Lifeline Syndicate & Anor 1990 (1) ZLR 284 (H) at 288E-F. The court is entitled to refuse to review or may condone the omission. WebAug 19, 2003 · bishy. short for bishounen, which literally means beautiful boy or pretty boy in japanese. usually describing a guy who has effiminate features as well as a slight …

Did you know?

WebSee Secretary for Transport & Another v Makwavarara 1991 (1) ZLR 18 (S). ... See Gula Ndebele v Bhunu NO 2010 (1) ZLR 78 (H), Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (H), Maheya v Independent Church of Africa SC 58/07, Muroiwa v Delta Operations Ltd & Another 2002 (2) ZLR 30 (S).

WebThe applicant had not filed the opposing papers. The papers opposing the application for review were eventually filed on 7 August 2024. By then the applicant was thirteen days out of time. On 7 November 2024 applicant then filed an application for condonation for late filing of the opposing papers. WebBishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (20 ZLR (H) at 242D-243C”. In casu assuming that the judgment was handed down on the 13th March 2015 which of course does not …

WebOct 10, 2007 · The reviewing judges should be careful not to erode such discretion – Ramushu & Ors v S SC-25-93; S v Matanhire HH-18-02; Mavhundwa v S HH-91-02; ... SA 135 (A) at 141C-E; S v McNab 1986 (2) ZLR 280 SC; Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (HC) at 243G-244F and Khumalo v Mafurirano HB-11-04. This is a … WebJun 3, 2014 · See also Beitbridge Rural District Council v Russell Construction Co (Pvt) Ltd 1998 (2) ZLR 190(S) at 193B-G; Bishi v Secretary for Education supra at 244A-D. This, to me, is an appropriate case for imputing upon the applicants the consequences of the non-compliance with the Rules by their legal practitioners.

WebRequirements: - Ref Case: - UNITED PLANT HIRE (PTY) LTD V HILLS AND ORS 1976(1) SA 717 (A) at p720F-G (HOLMES JA) quoted with approval by Chidyausiku CJ in the …

WebBishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (HC) The applicant, a teacher, had been found guilty by a disciplinary committee of misconduct in terms of the African … nottingham bluecoat school aspleyWebmay delegate its disciplinary functions to other officers Non disciplinary cases from LAW MISC at Midlands state university - Gweru nottingham backgammon clubWebBishi v Secretary for Education 1989(2) ZLR 240 (H) at 242D-243C. The applicant has been in a position of no right in respect to her occupation of the “church house” for the past seven years and the same period of time marks the degree of non-compliance with r 34(1) of the Rules of the Supreme Court. She has blamed her erstwhile legal ... nottingham b societyWebIn Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (HC) it was held per CHIDYAUSIKU J (as he then was) that the following are the factors to be taken into account in considering whether good cause has been shown: “(a) the degree of non-compliance with the rules; how to shoot in hoopzWebCommission v Moyo 1997(1) ZLR 254 (S) at 259A-B; Wilmot v Zimbabwe Owner Driver Organisation (Pvt) Ltd 1966(2) ZLR 415(S) and Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989(2) ZLR 240H. This court exercises judicial discretion in such matters. But, the applicant has to make a substantive application for the court to how to shoot in hoopz pcWebIn Ful Chand v. Nazab Ali Chowdhry 36 C. 184 : 9 C.L.J. 105 : 13 C.W.N. 134 : 1 Ind. Cas. 740 Stephen and Doss, JJ. also held that the absence of the wife makes no difference to … nottingham automotive richmond in 47374WebPETITIONER: BIBI AISHA & ORS. Vs. RESPONDENT: BIHAR SUBAI SUNNI MAJLIS AVAQAF & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/07/1968 BENCH: BACHAWAT, R.S. … nottingham booking.com